Dating the older man book
Dating the older man book - Live sex chat on mobil no register no account
The first six chapters are the history section, telling of a Jew named Daniel of royal descent, who was taken captive along with the rest of the people from the city of Jerusalem.King Nebuchadnezzer placed Daniel (among others) in his service, and had them trained.
The book of Daniel (composed by the man, the prophet Daniel) itself claims to have been written in the sixth century BC, indirectly.As for the historical arguments, there are four main contentions.The first has to do with the reference to Nebuchadnezzar in Daniel 1 :1 .They too agreed with Porphyry, that such long-range prophecies were impossible, so the book must have been written during the Maccabean age (second century BC; Baldwin, pg. Then in 1980, Klaus Koch wrote a powerful book questioning the Exilic date of writing (sixth century BC), and describing the Maccabean theory (Ferch, pg. However, I will attempt to show that the evidence points to an early date for the writing of Daniel, placing it in the sixth century BC.In Matthew , Jesus is discoursing in what we tend to call the "Little Apocalypse." In it, Jesus mentions Daniel, and a quote from his book.The book of Daniel is an apocalyptic of the Old Testament.
It is divided into two main parts: history and prophecy.He refers to the "'abomination the causes desolation,' spoken of through the prophet Daniel." Here, Jesus uses the Greek dia, along with the genitive case, which always implies personal human agency (Archer, pg 284) That should strongly lead one to believe that Jesus was under the impression that the Daniel he referred to was an actual person named Daniel, not just the title of a book.Jesus also calls that Daniel a profhtou, or "one who proclaims inspired utterances on behalf of God" (Louw).The last chronological event written as history (as opposed to prophecy) is "the third year of Cyrus King of Persia," (Dan 10:1) which was 537 BC (pg. This, together with the first date, gives us reason to believe that the book was probably written/compiled, according to the author, sometime quite soon after 537 BC, as he would have been somewhere over eighty years old (pg. The historical evidences stem from arguments that have been alleged that there are historical errors or inaccuracies in Daniel.The evidences are counter-arguments which use recent archaeological findings to prove that Daniel is correct, and our previous information was incomplete.In the verse account of Nabonidus, it is said that Nabonidus "entrusted the 'camp' to his eldest son ['Belshazzar] ...entrusted the kingship to him (Hasel, pg.